The Asantehene, Otumfuo Osei Tutu II, has stated his opposition to proposals seeking to include Queen Mothers as members of Ghana’s National House of Chiefs, arguing that such a move is inconsistent with established customs, traditions, and constitutional intent.
According to the Asantehene, the National House of Chiefs was created to represent the highest traditional authority within the chieftaincy institution, which, by long-standing customary practice across most traditional areas, is occupied by male paramount chiefs. He stressed that while Queen Mothers play indispensable and respected roles within traditional governance, their functions are distinct from those of chiefs and should not be conflated.
Respect for Tradition and Customary Structure
Otumfuo Osei Tutu II emphasized that chieftaincy in Ghana is rooted in diverse customs that must be preserved rather than re-engineered to fit contemporary political or social pressures. He noted that tradition assigns complementary but different responsibilities to chiefs and queen mothers, each critical to the stability of traditional authority.
For all the latest headlines, follow our WhatsApp Channel by tapping on the picture.
He cautioned that altering the composition of the National House of Chiefs without broad customary consensus could undermine the integrity of the institution and create constitutional and cultural complications.
Acknowledging the Role of Queen Mothers
The Asantehene was careful to clarify that his position should not be interpreted as diminishing the relevance or influence of Queen Mothers. He acknowledged their vital role in advising chiefs, safeguarding lineage, mentoring the youth, and promoting social cohesion within traditional societies.
However, he maintained that recognition of Queen Mothers should be pursued through mechanisms that respect customary boundaries rather than by inserting them into structures historically designed for chiefs.
Ongoing National Debate
The call for the inclusion of Queen Mothers in the National House of Chiefs has gained traction in recent years, driven by gender advocacy groups and some traditional leaders who argue that the current system does not adequately reflect the contributions of women in traditional governance.
The Asantehene’s position adds significant weight to the debate, given his influence within Ghana’s chieftaincy institution and his reputation as a custodian of tradition.
Balancing Modern Advocacy and Customary Law
This development highlights the broader national challenge of balancing evolving social expectations with deeply rooted customary law. As discussions continue, stakeholders are expected to engage in dialogue that carefully weighs constitutional provisions, cultural diversity, and the long-term implications for Ghana’s traditional institutions.
For now, the Asantehene’s stance reinforces a conservative interpretation of chieftaincy governance—one that prioritizes continuity, cultural authenticity, and respect for ancestral customs.
0 Comments